Just because we all agree with something does it make it right?

Studying Ethics in TOK looking at the ten commandments all of us agree on thou shalt not kill. But different societies have different laws . I couldn’t remember which country it was but there is a country where if a man cheats on his wife she is legally allowed to kill her husband as long as she uses her bare hands. how strange? How do we know when we have done something wrong? – because we feel bad or because it is not allowed and we fear the consequences. Ten commandments affect the safety of community. is something morally wrong because the wider majority believe so.  However some commandments can be countered. this ties into whether something is justified or not. If someone was to punch you in the face wouldn’t it be justified to punch them back. This is often the excuse parents face when dealing with younger children. Parent:why did you do that? Child: because he started it OR because he did it to me first! Aren’t there times when it is alright to tell lies? for example to keep a surprise. This all ties into conscience and as justin timberlake’s song says – ‘what goes around comes back around?’  and karma. There are times when we decide to ignore our conscience perhaps when we are particularly angry or vengeful our actions take on an impulsive quality. People with different character traits , with varying degrees of difficulty may choose to ignore their conscience. We are all selfish and seem to act for personal gain and thus provokes ideas that we don’t do things to others which we wouldn’t want done to us.

Advertisements

1 Comment (+add yours?)

  1. chtok
    Sep 22, 2013 @ 15:11:07

    An interesting post in which you raise a number of important points. You mention at the end something which sounds like what has been called ‘the golden rule’ of all of the world’s main religions (though in your view, it seems to be less about morality than enlightened self-interest!). Emmanuel Kant posited the idea of the categorical imperative which also argued that there was a more objective view of morality that was not based on culture or society but according to him on reason. This was opposed to what is called a consequentialist view of morality which Utilitarians would take and would be based on whatever the particular situation was and the consequencies arising from any moral decision which was taken. We will look at Kant and the Utilitarians in our next session.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: